Magpul

Trijicon SRS

• By admin
• 19 May, 2013
• No Comments

The weight is the other issue, and that i totally agree with. The whole aimpoit tube effect doesnt happen if you use both eyes. When i use my pro i just see a circle with a dot in the center. Also i fail to see how its more forgiving of head position when the hole we look into is the same size as an Aimpoint Another thin to remember is price and durability, my pro was $400 eith a 3yr battery life and built like a tank. If that things $800 its not going to do well, id also like to see how durable that big giant solar panel is when it takes a nice blow from a grunt dropping or slamming the rifle into some rocks When talking about RDSs, that’s the tube effect. The Trijicon SRS claims to reduce the width of that circle, and allow a more forgiving head position to see the dot. I’m not sure how it works having such a small ocular lense and a large body around the lense either, but thats their claim. I’m a bit leary of the solar panel, however, I know they can be made to be pretty near indestructible, and I can’t see Trijicon putting a frail panel on there. Some people still seem to think the fiber optic on the ACOGs are a week point. taseal